DNA barcoding for the verification of supplier's compliance in the seafood chain: How the lab can support companies in ensuring traceability.

Food Business Operators (FBOs) rely on laboratory analysis to ensure seafood traceability. DNA barcoding and Forensically Informative Nucleotide Sequencing may represent a support within self-checking programs finalized to suppliers' qualification and products identity certification. The present study aimed at verifying the usefulness of a decisional procedure (decision tree) set up at the FishLab (Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Italy) for seafood species identification by DNA analysis, to cope with FBOs' needs. The decision tree was applied to the analysis of 182 seafood (fish and molluscs) products, conferred to the FishLab by different FBOs between 2014 and 2015 as result of their self-checking activities. The analysis relied on a standard COI gene fragment eventually integrated by the analysis of alternative or supportive molecular targets (cytb and 16S rRNA). It also included a mini-DNA barcoding approach for processed products. Overall, 96.2% of the samples were unambiguously identified at species level using the elective target alone (92.4%) or a multi-target approach (3.8%). The lack of species identification (3.8%) was attributable to the absence of reference sequences or to the low resolution of the molecular targets. Nonetheless, all the molecular results were deemed adequate to evaluate the sample's compliance to the label information. Non-compliances were highlighted in 18.1% of the products. The protocol was proven as an effective supportive tool for the seafood identity verification within the supply chain self-checking activities. In addition, a considerable fraud rate was confirmed and the species most frequently involved in substitution were pointed out.

Meat from cattle slaughtered without stunning sold in the conventional market without appropriate labelling: A case study in Italy.

In the European Union, slaughter without stunning is allowed for religious slaughter to obtain halal and kosher meat. Especially in the case of Jewish slaughtering, cuts which are not deemed as kosher are sold to regular market without any specific labelling. This survey, conducted in Tuscany in 2016, aimed to quantify the carcasses rejected in relation to the type of religious slaughter. 656 bovines were slaughtered without stunning: 538 (82%) for halal and 118 (18%) for kosher. All carcasses slaughtered by the Islamic procedure (dhabiha) were considered halal, while 77.1% of carcasses slaughtered by the Jewish procedure (shechita) did not pass the approval. Carcasses were rejected after chest cavity inspection (50%) and after the lungs control (50%). This study provides an important insight in this field and postulates how to amalgamate the concepts of freedom of religion, as enshrined by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, with consumer rights and animal welfare.

Evolution of the Anisakis risk management in the European and Italian context.

Due to the social and legislative implications, the presence of Anisakis spp. larvae in fishery products has become a concern for both the consumers and the official Control Authorities. The issuance of a large number of provisions, aimed at better managing fish products intended to be consumed raw or almost raw and the associated risks, resulted in a very complicate legal framework. In this work, we analyzed the evolution of the normative through an overview on the local and international legislations, focusing on issues that are of practical interest for Food Business Operators (FBOs) in the fishery chain. In addition, we performed a survey across the Department of Prevention of the Italian Local Health Authorities (LHA) and the main fish markets in Italy to collect the operating procedures and the monitoring plans. Overall, we found many differences, due to the absence of a national reference standard for the management of the Anisakis risk. From this examination, it turns clear that only a participation of all the involved institutions, a strategy of synergistic interventions, as well as a correct training of FBOs, can result in an effective risk management and a proper risk communication, which should overcome states of confusion and unnecessary negative impacts on the economy.